|
Summary of Major Provision Changes to
the IDEA |
|
1997
Enforcement
Monitoring and enforcement of the IDEA were not specifically
addressed in 1997. Language in the bill did allow the Federal
government to sanction non-compliant States by withholding funds, but
the Department has never done so.
|
2004
Enforcement
The legislation requires a State and Federal partnership to enforce
the law by requiring States to develop a plan, establish targets and
meet them in the provision of a free appropriate education, general
supervision, transition services, and disproportionate representation
of minorities.
If States fail to meet targets, Federal sanctions will be applied,
including, withholding or directing funds or denying the flexible use
of funds, among other options.
|
|
Discipline
IDEA 1997 established the parameters for removing disabled students
from school when they have behavior problems.
1. When disciplining disabled students, a school must determine if
the behavior was a result of the disability before removing them from
school.
2. If students are removed from school, their services do not
cease.
3. When it was found that the child’s behavior was not a result of
their disability, the educational placement didn’t change, and
services continued. The burden was on the school to sue for a change
of placement.
4. Schools can remove students for 45 days, no questions asked, if
they bring a gun, bomb, or drugs to school.
|
Discipline
The
goal was to reverse bad policies enacted in the House bill.
1.
This requirement was maintained.
2.
This requirement was maintained.
3.
When it is found that the child’s behavior was not a result of their
disability, services continue, but the educational placement may be
changed. The burden is on the parent to appeal the decision.
4. In addition to removal for
guns, bombs, and drugs, students can be removed for committing serious
bodily injury. |
|
Early Intervening
Students who were struggling in school had to wait until they were
failing to get the help they needed through special education. |
Early Intervening
Schools will be able to use up to 15% of IDEA money to support
students who have academic and behavioral problems in regular
education, but who are not disabled. This will get services to
children earlier and prevent future problems.
|
|
Transition
In 1997, schools had to
consider transition issues for disabled students, but did not have to
set clear goals for life after school.
Agencies other than schools, such as Vocational Rehabilitation,
Social Security, and institutions of higher education, were not
required to participate in transition planning for students. |
Transition
Schools must plan for transition by setting transition goals and
providing transition services beginning at age 16.
A 3-year education plan focused on post-secondary goals can be
developed for students.
The vocational rehabilitation system will become more involved in
secondary schools and transition planning.
All disabled students who are leaving secondary school will receive
a summary of their accomplishments and transition needs along with
their report cards.
|
|
Teachers
State standards for special education teachers were not
well-defined, and as a result many special education teachers do not
have the skills they need.
|
Teachers
A standard for highly qualified teachers is established. To be
highly qualified, all teachers must be fully certified in special
education or pass State special education licensure exams, hold a
bachelors degree and demonstrate subject knowledge.
|
|
Teacher
Preparation
Teacher preparation was supported through State
Improvement Grants, which dedicated 75% of their funding to
professional development, and 25% to general capacity building
activities.
Teacher preparation was also supported through
grants for scholarships at colleges and universities. |
Teacher
Preparation
100% of State Personnel Development Grants will be
used for teacher improvement and professional development, with an
emphasis on efforts to recruit, prepare and retain well-qualified
teachers.
Enhances support for educators to ensure they possess the skills
and knowledge to help students with disabilities succeed, including by
creating a new grant program for institutions of higher education
focused on training beginning special educators through an extended
clinical experience or teacher-faculty partnerships.
|
|
Pre-school
and
Early Intervention Services
IDEA 1997 maintained two separate systems:
- one of early intervention programs for infants and
toddlers ages birth through 3,
- one for special education programs for children
with disabilities ages 3 through 5.
|
Pre-school
and
Early Intervention Services
States
will have the flexibility to develop a seamless system to serve
disabled children from ages birth through 5. |
|
Civil Rights
Parents who have an issue with their school have two
options to resolve the problem:
to engage in voluntary mediation with the school or
to go through due process.
Often, the local educational agency did not have an
opportunity to get involved in the issue and resolve the problem
before due process.
|
Civil Rights
If a parent files a complaint, the
parent and the local educational agency must meet and try to solve the
problem before a due process hearing can occur. This gives the local
educational agency the chance to solve the problem earlier without the
need for lawyers and hearings.
A 2-year statute of limitations is placed on a
parent’s ability to file a complaint, and a 90 day limitation on
appeals.
Parents and schools are expected to provide better
information to each other when they file complaints.
Hearing officers must decide cases based on the
denial of an appropriate education, not on procedural mistakes alone.
|
|
Accountability
Students with disabilities are included in state and
local accountability systems, but alternate assessments to measure the
progress of mentally retarded students did not count. |
Accountability
Alternate assessments are included as a part of
state and local accountability systems, and alternate assessments
aligned to alternative State standards are allowed.
A national study of alternate assessments will be
conducted to ensure that these assessments measure the progress of
mentally retarded students and that they meet appropriate standards.
|
|
Funds
Districts could use 20% of any increase in IDEA
funds flexibly for any local purpose.
Schools often had difficulty when they needed to
serve students with significant disabilities whose needs are very high
cost.
The law was silent on full-funding of special
education. |
Funds
School districts will now be able to use a portion of IDEA funds
for activities authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act, so long as the LEA is in compliance with IDEA.
States will be allowed to
establish risk pools to help districts pay for high cost students.
Mandatory full funding is not
provided for in this bill, but Congress states its commitment to reach
full-funding by 2011.
|
|
Paperwork and Meetings
Education plans for disabled students had to include
goals, and short-term objectives describing how those goals would be
met.
When developing or changing education plans, the
parent and a team of educators had to be present.
Since 1997, schools have complained that paperwork
from IDEA has taken too much time away from teaching. |
Paperwork and Meetings
Education plans still include goals for all students and short-term
objectives for the most severely disabled students. And schools must
report quarterly to parents of all children on how their child is
progressing toward their goals and how that progress is measured.
Schools and parents can develop and change education plans using
methods such as conference calls or by writing amendments rather than
holding meetings.
To ease paperwork, 15 states will
be given the opportunity to develop novel approaches to reducing
paperwork, while protecting the full civil rights of students in their
states.
|
|
Special Education
Research and Studies
Special education research was overseen by the Office of Special
Education Programs, rather than the Department’s research unit.
|
Special Education
Research and Studies
Special education research and will now be overseen by the
Department’s central research institute.
|